The panel emphasizes the need for more quality data to investigate UAPs and the stigma hindering proper research.
A NASA panel focused on studying Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) has raised concerns about the challenges in researching UFO sightings, particularly the stigma associated with reporting such events and the lack of high-quality data. In its first public meeting on Wednesday, the 16-member team outlined early findings and acknowledged that the public perception of UFOs has made it difficult to properly investigate these reports.
Daniel Evans, the assistant deputy associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, explained that although no convincing evidence links UFO sightings to extraterrestrial activity, the team remains open to all possibilities. The panel’s primary goal, however, is to assess national security risks, particularly the potential threats posed by unidentified objects in U.S. airspace.
Evans also clarified that the definition of UAPs has been expanded to include “unidentified anomalous phenomena,” covering not only aerial phenomena but also underwater and near-space encounters. This broadened scope allows for a more comprehensive investigation into mysterious sightings beyond just those in the sky.
Recent sightings, such as the Chinese spy balloon over Montana in February, have drawn heightened attention to UFOs, increasing public interest and prompting further investigation by U.S. intelligence agencies. Despite this, many of the UAP reports have been explained by conventional factors. Sean Kirkpatrick, the director of the Pentagon’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, shared that only a small fraction of reported UFOs, about 2-5%, display characteristics that warrant additional analysis.
Kirkpatrick noted that the majority of reports involve unusual orbs or spheres, which are often seen at altitudes where aircraft typically operate. However, the lack of sufficient data has made it difficult to draw conclusive scientific findings.
David Spergel, the panel’s chair, emphasized the importance of scientific skepticism when studying UAPs, stating that public opinion is divided between those convinced of the existence of UFOs and those who view the investigation as unnecessary. He called for a data-driven approach, acknowledging that scientists must start from a place of uncertainty and seek evidence before drawing conclusions.
As the panel prepares for its final report in the summer, it continues to advocate for more comprehensive data collection and the removal of stigma surrounding UAP research, which remains critical for national security and scientific understanding.
